OpenSourceProjects logo

Open Source Firefox Relay Alternatives

Discover 3 open source alternatives to Firefox Relay. All free, community-driven, and actively maintained.

Firefox Relay logo

What is Firefox Relay?

Firefox Relay creates unique email masks to protect your real email address and manage online accounts.

Visit Firefox Relay

TL;DR

  • Privacy first: Deploy anonaddy on your own infrastructure to eliminate any dependence on Mozilla's servers or policies.
  • Maximum control: Self-host app to own your entire email-masking system, domain, and forwarding rules without per-mask caps or subscription tiers.
  • Simplicity with ownership: Choose onetimesecret if you need a lightweight, MIT-licensed tool to keep sensitive data out of chat logs and email trails entirely.

Why teams leave Firefox Relay

Firefox Relay's free tier stops at 5 email masks—a hard ceiling that forces users toward paid plans as their account footprint grows. Beyond cost, the real friction emerges from architectural dependence: your aliases live on Mozilla's infrastructure, subject to Mozilla's domain reputation, pricing changes, and service continuity. The shared mozmail.com domain has become a liability; many signup forms now recognize and reject it outright, making masks unreliable exactly when you need them most. The 10 MB attachment limit silently fails larger messages, creating a hidden failure mode.

More fundamentally, this is a vendor lock-in problem. If Mozilla changes pricing, deprecates the service, or tightens policies, your entire alias infrastructure disappears with it. You cannot migrate masks to another provider or reclaim them on your own domain. Self-hosted alternatives flip this model: you control the domain, the server, the forwarding rules, and the data. There is no per-mask billing, no shared-domain reputation risk, and no exit cost—only the operational responsibility of running your own mail infrastructure.

Quick comparison

NameLicenseSelf-HostedAPI / ExtensibilityStack / LanguageBest For
appAGPL-3.0YesREST API, webhook supportPythonFull-featured alias management at scale
anonaddyAGPL-3.0YesREST API, browser extensionPHPPrivacy-focused teams wanting lightweight deployment
onetimesecretMITYesREST API, command-line toolsRubyEphemeral secret sharing outside email/chat

Top open-source alternatives to Firefox Relay

app

The SimpleLogin back-end and web application is a full-stack email-masking platform built in Python. It handles unlimited aliases on your own domain, supports custom forwarding rules, and exposes a REST API for programmatic alias creation and management. Deploy it on any server and own the entire forwarding pipeline.

Pros

  • Unlimited aliases and no per-mask caps; reply from any alias without a Premium tier.
  • REST API and webhook support enable integration into signup flows, password managers, and CI/CD pipelines.
  • Mature, well-starred project (6,685 GitHub stars) with active maintenance and a clear upgrade path from Mozilla's constraints.

Cons

  • Requires Python runtime and database administration; not a zero-configuration solution.
  • AGPL-3.0 license requires any modifications to be released; proprietary forks are not permitted.

anonaddy

anonaddy is a lightweight PHP-based email forwarding system designed for privacy and simplicity. Create unlimited aliases on your own domain, set up catch-all forwarding, and use the browser extension to generate masks on the fly. It prioritizes a small footprint and straightforward deployment.

Pros

  • Minimal dependencies and fast PHP deployment; runs on shared hosting or dedicated servers.
  • Browser extension and REST API make alias generation seamless during signup workflows.
  • Your domain, your rules—no shared-domain reputation issues and no hidden attachment limits.

Cons

  • Smaller community and fewer integrations than larger projects; some advanced features may require custom development.
  • AGPL-3.0 license applies; any self-hosted modifications must be open-sourced.

onetimesecret

onetimesecret is a Ruby-based secret-sharing tool designed to keep passwords, API keys, and sensitive data out of email inboxes and chat logs entirely. Generate ephemeral links that expire after a single view or a set time window, ensuring secrets never sit in plaintext in forwarded messages.

Pros

  • MIT license offers the most permissive terms; fork, modify, and deploy without open-sourcing your changes.
  • Simple REST API and command-line interface; integrates easily into scripts and automation.
  • Solves a complementary problem to email masking: it removes the need to email secrets in the first place.

Cons

  • Not a direct email-forwarding replacement; best used alongside alias services, not instead of them.
  • Smaller GitHub presence (2,765 stars) and narrower use case; fewer integrations with password managers and signup flows.

How to choose

Choose app if you need a feature-complete, production-grade alias system with API-first design and you have the ops capacity to run Python services. Pick anonaddy if you want a lightweight, PHP-friendly deployment that works on modest infrastructure and prioritizes simplicity. Use onetimesecret if your team's primary pain point is secrets leaking into email and chat—it is not a Firefox Relay replacement, but a complementary tool that eliminates the need to send sensitive data through email at all. For teams migrating from Firefox Relay, start with app or anonaddy; layer onetimesecret on top if your workflow involves frequent credential sharing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I self-host an open-source email alias service on my own domain?

Yes. Self-hostable alternatives let you run the entire forwarding system on your own infrastructure and custom domain from day one, eliminating dependence on Mozilla's servers or policies. You control the hardware, the forwarding rules, and the domain reputation—so your aliases won't be rejected by signup forms the way shared mozmail.com addresses increasingly are. Setup typically requires a VPS, a mail server, and basic DevOps knowledge, but documentation and community support vary by project.

What are the actual limits on aliases and forwarding with self-hosted solutions?

Self-hosted alternatives remove the artificial caps that plague Firefox Relay's free tier (5 masks) and paid tier (10 MB attachment limit). You can create unlimited aliases and forward messages of any size your mail server can handle, constrained only by your own hardware and bandwidth rather than a vendor's pricing tiers. This makes them practical for power users, developers, and organizations that need hundreds or thousands of masks without per-alias costs.

Do these open-source projects offer APIs for automation and integration?

Many self-hostable alternatives expose REST APIs that let you programmatically create aliases, manage forwarding rules, and integrate with your own applications and workflows. API availability and maturity vary by project, so review the documentation to confirm the endpoints and authentication methods match your stack. This extensibility is a major advantage over Firefox Relay, which offers limited programmatic control.

How do I migrate my existing Firefox Relay masks to a self-hosted alternative?

Migration is largely manual: you'll need to export or document your active masks from Firefox Relay, then recreate them in your self-hosted instance. Since Firefox Relay doesn't offer bulk export or API access for users, this process works best if you have a small number of critical aliases or can script the creation in your new platform's API. Plan for a transition period where both services run in parallel to avoid losing forwarded mail.

What technology stacks do self-hosted email alias services run on?

Open-source alternatives are built on a range of stacks—some use Node.js and PostgreSQL, others Python and MySQL—so compatibility depends on your infrastructure and DevOps comfort level. Most can run on standard Linux VPS providers or Docker containers, and many support common deployment patterns like Docker Compose or Kubernetes. Check the project's documentation for language, database, and system requirements before committing to a self-hosting setup.

What's the cost difference between Firefox Relay and self-hosting an alternative?

Firefox Relay's free tier is convenient but severely limited; its paid tier requires an ongoing subscription. Self-hosting shifts costs from recurring SaaS fees to upfront infrastructure: a basic VPS typically costs less per month than Firefox Relay's premium plan, with no per-alias or per-feature charges. The trade-off is that you assume responsibility for server maintenance, security patches, and backups—so total cost of ownership depends on your time and expertise.