OpenSourceProjects logo

Open Source Microsoft Teams Alternatives

Discover 22 open source alternatives to Microsoft Teams. All free, community-driven, and actively maintained.

Microsoft Teams logo

What is Microsoft Teams?

Microsoft Teams is a unified communication and collaboration platform for workplace messaging, video calls, and file sharing.

Visit Microsoft Teams
hubot
hubot logo

hubot

A customizable life embetterment robot.

Chatbot
open-im-server
open-im-server logo

open-im-server

IM Chat OpenClaw

Chat
chat
chat logo

chat

Instant messaging platform. Backend in Go. Clients: Swift iOS, Java Android, JS webapp, scriptable command line; chatbots

Chat Application
server
server logo

server

screen sharing for developers https://screego.net/

Screen Sharing
janus-gateway
janus-gateway logo

janus-gateway

Janus WebRTC Server

WebRTC
mumble
mumble logo

mumble

Mumble is an open-source, low-latency, high quality voice chat software.

Voice Chat
humhub
humhub logo

humhub

HumHub is an Open Source Enterprise Social Network. Easy to install, intuitive to use and extendable with countless freely available modules.

Enterprise Social Network
ejabberd
ejabberd logo

ejabberd

Robust, Ubiquitous and Massively Scalable Messaging Platform (XMPP, MQTT, SIP Server)

XMPP
thelounge
thelounge logo

thelounge

💬 ‎ Modern, responsive, cross-platform, self-hosted web IRC client

IRC Client
colanode
colanode logo

colanode

Open-source and local-first Slack and Notion alternative that puts you in control of your data

Chat Application
mirotalk
mirotalk logo

mirotalk

🚀 Self-hosted open-source WebRTC video conferencing platform built on peer-to-peer (P2P) architecture for fast, secure real-time communication with end-to-end privacy.

Video Conferencing
synapse
synapse logo

synapse

Synapse: Matrix homeserver written in Python/Twisted + Rust

Matrix
tailchat
tailchat logo

tailchat

Next generation noIM application in your own workspace, not only another Slack/Discord/Rocket.chat

Instant Messaging
weechat
weechat logo

weechat

The extensible chat client.

Chat
converse.js
converse.js logo

converse.js

Web-based XMPP/Jabber chat written in JavaScript

XMPP
jitsi-videobridge
jitsi-videobridge logo

jitsi-videobridge

Jitsi Videobridge is a WebRTC compatible video router or SFU that lets build highly scalable video conferencing infrastructure (i.e., up to hundreds of conferences per server).

WebRTC
Openfire
Openfire logo

Openfire

An XMPP server licensed under the Open Source Apache License.

XMPP
mirotalksfu
mirotalksfu logo

mirotalksfu

🏆 Self-hosted, open-source WebRTC video conferencing platform for real-time communication and collaboration. A modern alternative to Zoom, built on SFU architecture.

Video Conferencing
self-hosted
self-hosted logo

self-hosted

Deploy Stoat on your own infrastructure!

Docker
chitchatter
chitchatter logo

chitchatter

Secure peer-to-peer chat that is serverless, decentralized, and ephemeral

Chat
galene
galene logo

galene

The Galène videoconference server

Video Conference
openmeetings
openmeetings logo

openmeetings

Mirror of Apache Openmeetings

Video Conferencing

TL;DR

  • Need encrypted team chat with full data control? chat gives you a self-hosted messaging platform with iOS, Android, and web clients—no per-seat licensing.
  • Running a company-wide social network? HumHub replaces Teams' collaboration features as an enterprise social platform you host yourself.
  • Want a lightweight voice-first alternative? Mumble offers low-latency audio chat ideal for teams that prioritize voice over sprawling feature bloat.

Why teams leave Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams' tight integration with Microsoft 365 creates friction when you want to own your communication infrastructure. The platform bundles useful features into paid business tiers, meaning a "free" Teams setup lacks capabilities your team needs, forcing per-seat Microsoft 365 licensing at scale. More critically, exporting chat history, user data, or migrating away from the Microsoft ecosystem is non-trivial—your messages, files, and compliance records remain locked within OneDrive and Exchange.

For teams handling sensitive data, regulatory compliance, or multi-region deployments, Teams' cloud-only model and vendor lock-in across Word, Excel, Outlook, and OneDrive create operational and legal friction. Self-hosted open-source alternatives flip this model: you control where data lives, who accesses it, and whether it stays on your infrastructure or moves elsewhere without Microsoft's friction.

Quick comparison

NameLicenseSelf-HostedFederationE2E EncryptionBest For
hubotMITYes——Chatbot automation & workflow integration
open-im-serverApache-2.0Yes——IM infrastructure & custom messaging apps
chatGPL-3.0Yes——Full-featured encrypted team messaging
serverGPL-3.0Yes——Developer screen sharing & pair programming
janus-gatewayGPL-3.0Yes——WebRTC infrastructure & live streaming
MumbleLicense not declaredYes——Low-latency voice chat & gaming
HumHubLicense not declaredYes——Enterprise social networking & team collaboration
ejabberdLicense not declaredYesYes—Scalable XMPP/MQTT messaging infrastructure

Top open-source alternatives to Microsoft Teams

hubot

Hubot is a customizable chatbot framework that automates workflows and integrates with your chat infrastructure. It's JavaScript-based and designed to extend messaging platforms with custom logic—deployable on your own servers.

Pros:

  • Lightweight automation layer for chat commands and integrations
  • MIT license allows commercial use and modification
  • Reduces manual tasks by scripting chat interactions

Cons:

  • Not a standalone chat platform—requires a chat system to integrate with
  • Requires JavaScript/Node.js operational knowledge

open-im-server

Open-IM-Server is a messaging infrastructure built in Go, designed for teams building custom IM applications. It provides backend APIs for chat, user management, and message routing without forcing you into a pre-built client.

Pros:

  • Apache-licensed and built for scalability
  • Language-agnostic API—integrate any frontend
  • Suitable for organizations needing a messaging backbone without UI lock-in

Cons:

  • Requires custom client development or integration work
  • Steeper setup than all-in-one platforms

chat

Chat is a full-featured instant messaging platform with native clients for iOS, Android, JavaScript web, and a scriptable command-line interface. Built in Go and licensed under GPL-3.0, it's designed for teams wanting encrypted messaging without cloud dependency.

Pros:

  • Multi-platform clients out of the box (mobile, web, CLI)
  • Chatbot support for automation
  • Self-hosted with no per-user fees

Cons:

  • GPL-3.0 license restricts proprietary modifications
  • Smaller ecosystem compared to Teams' integrations

server

Server (Screego) is a screen-sharing tool for developers, built in Go. It focuses on peer-to-peer screen sharing without requiring browser plugins or external services, ideal for pair programming and remote debugging.

Pros:

  • Simple, plugin-free screen sharing
  • GPL-3.0 licensed for transparency
  • Low-latency for real-time collaboration

Cons:

  • Focused narrowly on screen sharing—not a full chat/collaboration suite
  • Requires complementary tools for messaging

janus-gateway

Janus Gateway is a WebRTC server written in C, enabling real-time audio, video, and data streaming. It's a low-level infrastructure tool for building video conferencing, live streaming, and peer-to-peer applications.

Pros:

  • GPL-3.0 licensed, battle-tested in production
  • Highly flexible for custom real-time applications
  • Handles complex media routing and SFU (Selective Forwarding Unit) patterns

Cons:

  • Requires significant development effort—not a ready-to-use video conference tool
  • Steep learning curve for WebRTC concepts

Mumble

Mumble is a low-latency, open-source voice chat application with clients for Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android. Originally built for gaming, it's equally suited to teams needing crystal-clear voice communication without video overhead.

Pros:

  • Extremely low latency and high audio quality
  • Lightweight and runs on modest hardware
  • Self-hosted servers with no per-user licensing

Cons:

  • Voice-only—no text chat or video (though can be paired with other tools)
  • Smaller ecosystem of third-party integrations

HumHub

HumHub is an enterprise social network platform combining messaging, activity streams, file sharing, and team collaboration. Self-hosted and modular, it replaces Teams' broader collaboration features with a social-network-first model.

Pros:

  • All-in-one social collaboration—chat, files, activity feeds, and community features
  • Extensive module marketplace for extending functionality
  • PHP-based, straightforward to deploy and customize

Cons:

  • Larger footprint than lightweight messaging-only tools
  • Requires more server resources than minimal alternatives

ejabberd

Ejabberd is a robust, massively scalable messaging platform built in Erlang that implements XMPP, MQTT, and SIP protocols. It's enterprise-grade infrastructure for organizations needing federation, standards compliance, and carrier-class reliability.

Pros:

  • Federated messaging—users can communicate across different XMPP servers
  • Supports multiple protocols (XMPP, MQTT, SIP) in one platform
  • Built for massive scale and high availability

Cons:

  • XMPP is standards-based but less intuitive than modern chat UIs
  • Requires operational expertise for production deployment

How to choose

For a drop-in Teams replacement with messaging, files, and social features, start with HumHub—it covers the broadest use cases and requires minimal integration work.

If your priority is encrypted, portable team chat without vendor lock-in, chat provides native clients across platforms and is purpose-built for messaging.

For voice-first teams or low-latency real-time collaboration, Mumble excels where video is secondary and audio quality matters most.

If you're building custom applications or need infrastructure-level flexibility, ejabberd (federation & scale), janus-gateway (WebRTC), or open-im-server (API-first) provide the foundation to build on.

For workflow automation layered onto any chat system, hubot and server (screen sharing) are best used alongside a primary messaging tool.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I self-host an open-source Teams alternative on my own infrastructure?â–Ľ

Yes—self-hosted open-source projects like open-im-server and humhub let you run chat and collaboration servers on your own hardware or private cloud, giving you full control over infrastructure, updates, and data location. This eliminates dependence on Microsoft's cloud and the per-seat licensing model that scales with team size. You manage backups, security patches, and compliance yourself, which requires more operational overhead but removes vendor lock-in.

How do I export my message history from Teams, and what are the alternatives?â–Ľ

Exporting data out of Microsoft Teams is non-trivial; Teams' deep integration into Microsoft 365 makes portability difficult by design. Open-source platforms like open-im-server and chat typically store messages in standard formats (databases, JSON, or plain text) that you can query and export directly, or they provide built-in export tools. Self-hosting means you own the database and can extract your conversation history at any time without relying on vendor cooperation.

Do open-source Teams alternatives support voice and video calls?â–Ľ

Many do, though feature maturity varies. Projects like janus-gateway and mumble provide voice and video infrastructure that can be integrated into chat platforms, and some self-hosted solutions bundle these capabilities. Open-source implementations often require more configuration than Teams' integrated calling, but they give you control over codec choices, encryption, and whether calls are recorded or logged.

Can open-source alternatives federate or interoperate with other chat systems?â–Ľ

Federation support depends on the platform; ejabberd and some implementations of open-im-server support federation or standards-based protocols (like XMPP or Matrix) that allow communication across different server instances or even different software. Microsoft Teams does not federate with non-Microsoft systems, locking your team into the Microsoft 365 ecosystem. Open standards-based alternatives give you the option to connect with partners and teams on different platforms without forcing everyone onto the same vendor.

What compliance and data residency benefits do self-hosted alternatives offer?â–Ľ

Self-hosting lets you keep all chat data within your own country or region, critical for organizations bound by GDPR, HIPAA, or other data residency laws. With Microsoft Teams, your data location is determined by Microsoft's data center policy, and compliance features often sit behind higher-tier paid plans. Open-source alternatives like humhub and open-im-server let you choose your hosting location, control encryption keys, and audit data handling directly—no need to purchase premium licensing tiers to meet compliance requirements.

How does the cost of open-source alternatives compare to Microsoft Teams licensing?â–Ľ

Microsoft Teams' most useful features (advanced integrations, compliance tools, larger file storage) are bundled into Microsoft 365 paid tiers with per-seat pricing that scales with team size. Open-source alternatives have no per-user licensing cost; you pay only for infrastructure (servers, hosting, or cloud compute). For large teams, self-hosting can be significantly cheaper, though you absorb the cost of system administration and maintenance instead of paying Microsoft for managed service.